Prejudice

Re: Tulgey Logger and others

Meanwhile, Paul Elam just added racist sack of shit to his title of misogynist and would-be rape-legalizer:

NurdyDancing

We have several black contributors, and a lot of MRAs are also racial minorities. You seem to have more interest in reinforcing your prejudices than finding the truth.

As others have said, there was no trial in the Duke Lacrosse case. Nor, for that matter, was there a trial in the DSK case, or the Assange case.

I said this was how many trials are handled. I know there was no trial, but the accused were abused and the case was mishandled. Just because the case never made it into the court rooms does not mean an investigation never occurred nor does it mean that this is not indicative of how many cases are handled. Had Mike Nifong’s own motivations not been exposed, there is a reasonable probability that those men would be in jail right now.

To address those claiming that the accuser in the Duke Lacrosse case had been discredited, it would be more accurate to say that the investigators and the prosecutor had been discredited for their unscrupulous tactics. If there really was evidence that a rape had occurred, then why withhold and destroy that evidence?

Advertisements

About ideologuereview

Disclaimer: I’m not responsible for every word out of the mouths of everyone who believes in men’s equality, any more than I’m going to answer for everything ever said by someone who likes cheese.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s